The table is inlaid on top and the front and back center of aprons. Has cabriole legs and very carved and pierced galleried aprons and top gallery. Generally an hourglass shape. No manufacturer stamp visable. It has a 1/4" (fitted to contour) glass top. Slight repair (reglued) one inch square of inlay on back apron. Overall, very good condition.

Size is W-41 3/4" x D-18 3/4" x H-19" 

14 karat gold, 7 jewels

Engraved on front and back

Clear crystal cover on front; double metal covers in back

Serial # 8102604 on movement

Serial # 3687575 on case

made in USA

Working order; keeps time.  Pin winding.

Excellent condition

These items are marked on the inside left side of one drawer with "Mount Airy Table Company".

The China cabinet is appx 7 ft tall. the left two bottom doors open up to two drawers, and the right two open up to shelves. The same is true for the hutch.  All the bottom doors used to have some kind of cross-hatched kind of decoration or something that the previous owners discarded, don't think I ever really seen what it looked like. The glass shelves all match, original or not. They have a plate slot across the back. There are lights (2) in the top of the cabinet with a longer thin bulb, barlely used them so never had to replace one yet.

Also came with a large dining table with 6 chairs,3 leaves, and a full set of pads, however, at a quick glance, we see no makers marks on the set, so it may not belong.

Saji Fancy China tea cup and saucer. Made in Japan.

Backstamp shows crown and banner with the word SAJI in the banner.  Underneath it says Made in Japan, Fancy China.

It's very ornate, gold accents. The outside of the cup is completely encrusted in gold. Both cup and saucer have scalloped edges.

There is a small crack in the saucer, on the bottom. It doesn't show on the top. No other cracks. No chips, no crazing.

I have a painting that looks like artist name is D. Sievers. The year is 1977.

Brass and Bakelite (Maybe?) victorian brass Cufflinks. If not victorian than perhaps still antique? The man said they were ringling brothers circus cufflinks but im not sure that is true. Trade mark is on the back but trademark of what I do not know. I have not been able to find evidence of the ringling claim.