This appraisal is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute a certified, licensed, or formal appraisal.
Appraisal results are generated using automated systems, including artificial intelligence, and are based solely on the information and images submitted by the user, along with publicly available data. As such, results may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or errors.
InstAppraisal does not authenticate items. No determination of authenticity, origin, materials, maker, or age should be considered verified. Many items—particularly luxury goods, watches, jewelry, coins, art, and designer products—are frequently counterfeited and may closely resemble genuine examples. Authenticity cannot be confirmed from images alone.
Any statements regarding authenticity are expressions of opinion only and should not be relied upon as fact. Independent professional authentication is strongly recommended before any purchase, sale, or valuation decision.
Appraisal values are estimates only and may vary significantly based on condition, provenance, market demand, and additional information not available at the time of review.
Appraisals must not be relied upon for insurance, legal, tax, estate, or financial purposes without independent professional verification.
InstAppraisal disclaims all liability for any losses, damages, or disputes arising from reliance on this appraisal, including transactions conducted based on the information provided.
By using this service, you acknowledge and agree that you assume all risk associated with reliance on appraisal results.
Re: Qing Bowl 17th Century
The photos don't show enough detail and there's some glare, but here goes: The reign mark is for Shunzhi the first emperor (1644-61) of the Qing Dynasty. Authentic items bearing the imperial seal of Shunzhi are so exceedingly rare that some experts say they are nonexistent. The chaos caused by the fall of the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644) led to the destruction of the main kiln sites at Jingdezhen, and porcelain production didn't really pick up again until mid-way through the reign of Kangxi (1662-1722). Therefore, genuine mark-and-period Shunzhi imperial wares may not even exist, according to some experts. It is believed that the earliest appearance of the Shunzhi mark is on pieces dating from the Yongzheng-era (1722-35), a "tribute" practice, which continued under Qianlong (1736-95). If that is the case here, what you have is still a fine 18th century Chinese Qing Dynasty blue and white porcelain bowl, complete with dragons. There is the small chance that it could be of 19th manufacture, but I don't think so. By the way, who looked at it on Antiques Roadshow? Was it Lark Mason? He's the main expert for Chinese furniture and porcelain.